- Reviews & Essays
- Solution to the World Terrorist Problem
Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.
You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.
Click hereI have thought about this very carefully. I know what we should do about this Moslem terrorist problem facing all the innocent people of the world. Sex. And lots of it. Since celibacy and sexual frustration are at the root of the problem.
What I think we should do, all of us “infidels” here in New York City and Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania in America, Lockerbie Scotland; those train stations in Spain, and numerous locations that al-Qaida used to practice their terrorist activities in Africa (too bad al-Qaida rightly figured that the rest of the world would ignore their murderous activities on the African continent if it was mostly Africans being killed) is to turn this problem over to all the honest, peace-loving Moslems to take care of themselves.
My Moslem friend on the internet, one of the numerous Hassan’s in the Moslem world, tells me that he deplores these acts of terrorism and that all “good” moslems do, too.
Hassan says, and I quote here...
hassan says:
i know the world its in the trouble.
hassan says:
I think this people made that without heart and sentiment.
Vee: Korea?
hassan says:
when I saw them try to killing him also I saw his family craying in korea I felt very deep in my heart.
Vee:
Hassan, I do not think they try to kill that Korean businessman. They showed pictures of his head being lobed off.
Vee says:
the people from Korea are like the people from Spain, these countries think that if they run scared from al-qaida then al-Qaida will leave everyone alone
hassan says:
I am very sad about terrorism....also I dislike them kiiling
hassan says:
all country now fraid about torrorism
hassan says:
I am not like Moslem terrorists....cause islam not said kiiling the others people
hassan says:
we are human, to make love to each others vee
hassan says:
its very hard to see that when I saw some movies from iraque and all people kiiling in iraque, I fell what did you think ..I was hurt in my feelings ..its not islam and also its not human to make that killing
Vee says:
What do you think? to take care of moslem terrorists?? You tell me Hassan?
Vee says:
I am asking to know what you think we (all the rest of the whole world) should do to eradicate all the moslem terrorists?
hassan says:
here all moslem not like that to killing innicent people ...islam NOT killing inncent people...its NOT islam its terrorism
hassan says:
yes its ture but not all moslem is a terrorist
Vee says:
Yes I know, I really know not all Moslems are terrorists.. I know many moslems are innocent
Vee says:
BUT I do know all terrorists ARE Moslems
Vee says:
but YOU are the only one who can tell the difference.
Because you see, that is the issue. The only truth. It is only within their very own community of moslems that the terrorist branch of the moslem extremist sects can be identified, routed out and eliminated from the presence of civilized people.
But whom would we turn to? Certainly not a people or a country that was poor or weak, because the terrorist are well funded and would only bribe the poor, weak country into leaving them to continue their rampage.
Well, probably the best plan would be to find the most powerful moslems in the world. That would be the way to deal with an out-of-control violent movement such as al-Qaida. Or al-Aqsa or Hamas. Or how about the remnants of the Taliban who have caused as much terror for Afghani Moslems as they ever thought to cause to the western world. Yes, the Taliban who now hide out in caves, waiting for the opportunity to raise again and lent their evil to the next bunch of Moslem ruffians.
Where would we go for this intervention? The most powerful Moslem nation on earth. Is there any other choice than Saudi Arabia? But, would they be our best ally in the pursuit of suppressing terrorism?
After all, the bin Laden family (yes, Osama’s very own father and brothers) are ardent supporters and close personal friends to the ruling Saudis’ King Fahd bin Abdulaziz.
You can almost hear the conversation out on the veranda directly off the royal throne room of the great royal palace in Riyadh, as the king and his throb clad male friends sit around a beautiful platter of communal lamb and rice, sipping sweet honey-mint tea from small gold tea cups.
Flipping the ghuta out of his face to take another bite of the honeyed lamb, the King continues the conversation.
King Fahd: Nu? Omar, what is that scamp of a brother of yours up to these days?
Omar bin Laden: Oh.. Haa haa haa, that Osama is such a cut-up. Ha, he has been so busy lately, what with both wife #2 and wife #4 about to have a blessed event.
King Fahd: Yes, yes, I am sure he is fruitful, what is this? Eighteen? Twenty children for the black sheep of the bin Laden family?
Omar: 26!
King Fahd: Not to bad for the mere son of a concubine.
Omar: But there is his regular day job which keeps him busy, too. Let me see? If I count them off on my fingers.
Omar: Osama’s boys hit that American airfield in Afghanistan for 6 soldiers killed ..uh.. Two Spanish businessmen killed in Kandehar and numerous wounded in that gun battle..
King: Plus those two bombings in Turkey
Omar: Actually, three bombings in Turkey, my esteemed King, if I might dare to correct you. With all due respect, of course. And the destruction of a British bank and part of the British Embassy demolished also.
King: Yes, three bombings, but that was such a long while ago..
Omar: True, very true, your Majesty. Two Iraqi ministers that the Americans had hoped to use in the new Iraqi government. He was responsible for them, too.
Prince Saud Al-Faisal, the King’s brother: And numerous religious leaders not of our sect, my dear brother.
King: Yes, I can see my money is well spent there.
Omar: And car bombings. Haa haa, your Majesty knows that Osama’s goal is at least a car bombing per day, if not in Bagdad or Fallujah then in some city worldwide. My dear brother Osama is working very, very diligently to meet those goals. All of his adult and teenaged son’s are now working in his organization to help fulfill those goals.
Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz, the King’s heir: We all know how dedicated Osama is. I always knew that boy would go far. When we partied years ago in Beirut, he swore to become an infidel killing machine and he is a true, honorable son of Islam, true to his word.
King: Yes, yes.
Omar bin Laden: Do not forget the thirty American Marines who were killed when the entrance to their compound was destroyed by the two truck bombs recently! Ha, now THAT was a fireworks display!!!
All the men are chuckling and slapping their knees in mirth. Yes, that Osama bin Laden sure does know how to create a spectacular photo-op. The men settle down quickly as they notice that the King is not laughing but is frowning slightly.
If the King is not laughing than the men know they have not understood the joke properly, and all sober up immediately. In seriousness all eating ceases and all eyes turn to their King.
King: Yes, thirty American soldiers and three British and what..twenty Iraqis killed or injured? But my friend George was not happy about that one.
King: No, hot happy at all. Too many, Omar. Way, way too many Americans all at one time. George’s father called me, for Allah’s sake!! The American father and son were offended.
The king regarded all his ministers and friends present with a seriously murderous face.
King: Do you know how much I hate to hear from George the Father!
Prince Saud al-Faisal, the king’s favorite brother and Minister on the Interior: Oh, yeah, the father is a tiger.
King: Omar, you will caution your brother! It is imperative that his successes move forward more... discretely.
Ok, Ok. Maybe the King of Saudi Arabia may not be the best choice to hunt down Osama bin Laden and all the moslem terrorists of al-Qaida and Hamas and Taliban, etc.
But, if the Saudis might not be the best candidates for tracking down Osama bin Laden, and actually they ARE the logical choice, then an alterative source must be found. Why have the great leaders in Mecca and Medina not come forward, if Moslems are truly appalled by the inhuman slaughter that Osama has unleashed on the world.
Anyway, we let a group of Moslems track down these characters and then....? Well, what then do we do with all these terrorists to defuse them so that more idiots are not inspired to become terrorists in their place? Killing them will only make them martyrs.
Marry them off.
Yep, as simple as that!! The problem with all these terrorists running around is that they are busy in the deserts training themselves to kill innocent human beings., living the celibate life of religious virgins, scratching their crotches whenever they want and peeing on the side of trees. Is this a sane life for a man?
The best way to ease them out of their current life of decrepitude is to get each and every one of them their own wife. Wife, sex (all that celibacy is at the root of their insanity anyway), a home and furniture payments, sex, and a normal, mind numbing job, then more sex. Children, religious school classes, ballet lessons, sex, and little league baseball, soccer, and of course, band recitals.
And if the idea of flying an airplane into the side of a skyscraper re-occurs to these retired terrorists, and I am sure that it will after the fourth or fifth child arrives and the second or third time they are laid off from another mind numbing job-back breaking job, then their wives will be right there to disabuse them of that means of escape by reminding them of their familial obligations. And, of course, there will be the joys of sex.
Right?
* * * * *
Thanks for reading this work. Please vote to indicate how much you enjoyed it (?), or how much it intrigued you and send feedback if you can spare the time. Your votes and feedback are the only way I will know how much you appreciated my effort and furnish the only means to improve my writing.
Thank you, Vee
- COMMENTS
V.Richover 19 years agoAuthorDear Anonymous "Fan"
I understand that you disagree with me on my views on how to sexually corrupt all those virginal and frustrated Moslem terrorists. And I have no problem with your disagreement, because everyone has a right to their own opinion.
But the numbers don't jive.
Dear Anonymous, you spent 1850 words refuting my essay that only contained 1740 words! Don't you have enough guts to just go ahead and write your own essay? Wouldn't that be better? Then everyone on Literotica could persue your article for themselves and give you their feedback directly.
Don't you think THAT is a great idea?? I think this is fair if the feedback contains more words than the original piece.
What do you think??
Anonymousover 19 years agoIt is very plausible that celibacy and every other strict sexual moral will
cause serious harm to the individuals it is applied to. And it is quite
plausible that the royal family of Saudi Arabia that is nursed by the US for
some reasons is supporting terrorism; it is even known that investigations
right after September the 11th that led into this direction were cancelled
for these reasons. But for its most part this essay is misleading. It takes
for granted that on the one hand Muslim terrorism is the greatest source of
terrorism in this world. It links terrorism to Islamic faith. And it assumes
that an explanation for the terrorists? strange behaviour is yet to be
found. It is perfectly right ?they? don?t ?hate us for our freedom and
democracy?, though it?s correct that the US does obstruct the development of
true democracy in so-called democracies like Egypt; democratic elections
would result in the election of religious parties in most of these
countries. Thus their peoples are left to be governed by men that have no
authorization to govern them. The US supports Israel?s rightists in their
quest to completely deprive the Palestinian people of its land. George does
not even stick to the highly weird ?roadmap?: even more land shall be
occupied. He very meekly retreated from his claims after massive
international and especially European protests (not to say that Europe
engages in progressive and peaceful activities, on the contrary). And in
Iraq the US kills far more innocent civilians than the Arabs will ever be
able to. If you are reluctant to believe me the most impressive text on this
issue I have read is Paul Rockwell interviewed by Chris Hedges: ?Atrocities
in Iraq ? 'I Killed Innocent People For Our Government'?. It should be
easily found with the help of google. And there are numerous other sources.
US soldiers and mercenaries (that will be listed under civilian casualties
or not become known to the US public at all) aren?t only not held
accountable for their killings of innocent Iraqi citizens, they even
systematically kill survivors of military assaults on alleged terrorist
targets that are completely unable to defend themselves. Abu Ghraib as an
example of systematic torture was surely not a great idea to foster Iraqi
belief in the great crusade for freedom and democracy of the US (this is not
at all an exception, remember Guantanamo bay? If not try George Monbiot:
XXX). So we obstruct democratization of the Arab nations and deliberately
slaughter and torture their kinsmen in Palestine and Iraq. And some US
statesmen think about Iran as well. So the alleged terrorists ? everyone
fighting against US interests is a terrorist and everyone fighting against
them is a freedom fighter ? do have some reasons to hate the US. It is not
in their lunatic leaders, it is in everyone in the Third world. The Muslims
only have some money and, admitted, a certain religious common ground that
unites them and strengthens their solidarity for each other. If the US
withdrew from Iraq, stopped to support Israel with weapons and Saudi Arabia
and other dictatorships in the Middle East terrorism would decease
considerably. Other means will cause impact, if they in any foster these
goals.
I am yet to remind that US state terrorism has a greater impact than Muslim
terrorism. In Haiti an opposition supported by about 5% of the population
but well armed by you-know-who committed massacres on the population in the
presence and even with the support of French and US troops in order to
overthrow the democratically elected government of President Aristide. The
election that brought him to power with a great majority and was
subsequently called ?seriously flawed? by the US mainstream press met
international standards to a higher degree than the US election that brought
Bush to power. Remember some thousand black voters removed from voter?s list
just before the election and the stop of the recounting? And the new rulers
of Haiti continue to kill thousands of former Aristide supporters in their
cause to purge the country from the thought of self-determination. If you
are interested in the relations between death squads in South America and
John Negroponte you won?t have problems to get the information from the net.
And, finally, the US has some time ago supported Ecuador with a large credit
to buy Spain tanks (as it supports similar regimes with similar credits all
over the world). These tanks, if the new Spanish government should be
willing to deliver them, will be deployed at the Venezuelan border. Some
skirmishes in this area have already occurred and it is likely that if the
referendum against Chavez fails and Ecuador is strong enough such a skirmish
might become a pretext to invade the most advanced democracy in South
America (if Chavez were an autocrat like most US media tells, how come that
you virtually hear no voices supporting him from his country?s media which
is in fact completely controlled by a rich minority?). If the people of
these countries only had the means that Saudi Arabia is able to provide
their reaction to US terrorism would have a more threatening impact than
nowadays. So if you think about means of fighting terrorism the US is the
best place in the world to do so. Protesting against your troops being sent
abroad will reduce Muslim as well as US terrorism. And one of the most important
short term necessities: don?t elect him again!
Anonymousover 19 years agolol ... that essay stirred a few .. bet you get more .. and bet you got some nasty emails,,,
have to correct you on one point though ,, not all terrorists are of the Islam-belief .. just think ETA, IRA, path ot the light (or whatever you call it in english - columbia), the red brigades (yes they are still alive -not very active at the moment though) - and a lot more! .... oh and the bin laden family are no friends of the King od Saudi Arabia....
it's just that the islamists gets more headlines for the time beeing ..
I think that George (and happy birthday to him) could have handled things more diplomatic .. but one thing we never hear is that he had his fleet and army and airforce surrounding Iraq for a long time - that is very stretching on both personnel and economics .. he had to at the time either act (wich he chose to do) or retract and regroup, wich would've taken probably 6 month or more - and I don't think that sweedish guy could've found anything even if he had 6 years to search. Georges problem is that he -allegedly- said that Iraq had means of mass destruction - and used that as reason for the attack - he should have done as our gov did: say that Saddam had dragged UN by the nose for 12 yrs and wasn't going to comply to anything - and that "we" had to go in and look see if he had any weapons of mass destruction. But I have to say it was a little na?ve to believe that when "we" had concurred Saddam all would be great and all Iraqees would be happy over night ..
Anonymousover 19 years agoIt is very plausible that celibacy and every other strict sexual moral will cause serious harm to the individuals it is applied to. And it is quite plausible that the royal family of Saudi Arabia that is nursed by the US for some reasons is supporting terrorism; it is even known that investigations right after September the 11th that led into this direction were cancelled for these reasons. But for its most part this essay is misleading. It takes for granted that on the one hand Muslim terrorism is the greatest source of terrorism in this world. It links terrorism to Islamic faith. And it assumes that an explanation for the terrorists? strange behaviour is yet to be found. It is perfectly right ?they? don?t ?hate us for our freedom and democracy?, though it?s correct that the US does obstruct the development of true democracy in so-called democracies like Egypt; democratic elections would result in the election of religious parties in most of these countries. Thus their peoples are left to be governed by men that have no authorization to govern them. The US supports Israel?s rightists in their quest to completely deprive the Palestinian people of its land. George does not even stick to the highly weird ?roadmap?: even more land shall be occupied. He very meekly retreated from his claims after massive international and especially European protests (not to say that Europe engages in progressive and peaceful activities, on the contrary). And in Iraq the US kills far more innocent civilians than the Arabs will ever be able to. If you are reluctant to believe me the most impressive text on this issue I have read is Paul Rockwell interviewed by Chris Hedges: ?Atrocities in Iraq ? 'I Killed Innocent People For Our Government'?. It should be easily found with the help of google. And there are numerous other sources. US soldiers and mercenaries (that will be listed under civilian casualties or not become known to the US public at all) aren?t only not held accountable for their killings of innocent Iraqi citizens, they even systematically kill survivors of military assaults on alleged terrorist targets that are completely unable to defend themselves. Abu Ghraib as an example of systematic torture was surely not a great idea to foster Iraqi belief in the great crusade for freedom and democracy of the US (this is not at all an exception, remember Guantanamo bay? If not try George Monbiot: XXX). So we obstruct democratization of the Arab nations and deliberately slaughter and torture their kinsmen in Palestine and Iraq. And some US statesmen think about Iran as well. So the alleged terrorists ? everyone fighting against US interests is a terrorist and everyone fighting against them is a freedom fighter ? do have some reasons to hate the US. It is not in their lunatic leaders, it is in everyone in the Third world. The Muslims only have some money and, admitted, a certain religious common ground that unites them and strengthens their solidarity for each other. If the US withdrew from Iraq, stopped to support Israel with weapons and Saudi Arabia and other dictatorships in the Middle East terrorism would decease considerably. Other means will cause impact, if they in any foster these goals.
I am yet to remind that US state terrorism has a greater impact than Muslim terrorism. In Haiti an opposition supported by about 5% of the population but well armed by you-know-who committed massacres on the population in the presence and even with the support of French and US troops in order to overthrow the democratically elected government of President Aristide. The election that brought him to power with a great majority and was subsequently called ?seriously flawed? by the US mainstream press met international standards to a higher degree than the US election that brought Bush to power. Remember some thousand black voters removed from voter?s list just before the election and the stop of the recounting? And the new rulers of Haiti continue to kill thousands of former Aristide supporters in their cause to purge the country from the thought of self-determination. If you are interested in the relations between death squads in South America and John Negroponte you won?t have problems to get the information from the net. And, finally, the US has some time ago supported Ecuador with a large credit to buy Spain tanks (as it supports similar regimes with similar credits all over the world). These tanks, if the new Spanish government should be willing to deliver them, will be deployed at the Venezuelan border. Some skirmishes in this area have already occurred and it is likely that if the referendum against Chavez fails and Ecuador is strong enough such a skirmish might become a pretext to invade the most advanced democracy in South America (if Chavez were an autocrat like most US media tells, how come that you virtually hear no voices supporting him from his country?s media which is in fact completely controlled by a rich minority?). If the people of these countries only had the means that Saudi Arabia is able to provide their reaction to US terrorism would have a more threatening impact than nowadays. So if you think about means of fighting terrorism the US is the best place in the world to do so. Protesting against your troops being sent abroad will reduce Muslim as well as US terrorism. And the most important short term necessity: don?t elect him again!
