Getting to know a man is always an intriguing experience. It's hard enough to understand what is going on in a man's head, but I particularly enjoy learning his body. I like to run my hands over a man's face, memorize not only how it looks, but also how it feels. Trying to imagine that I'm blind, I feel the face and wonder if I could recreate it from memory.
My interests are definitely not just limited to faces. I like to learn the way a man feels all over his body, where every scar and freckle lies, and what texture the skin has. This also means that I'm interested in what reactions different sensations cause in a man; while there are some basics that all men enjoy, each has a particular preference. This is especially true for usage of their more intimate parts of the body, and this led a rather interesting journey of discovery for me.
Growing up in the northeast of the United States, my early sexual experiences with men were all with men who were circumcised. I learned everything I had to know about pleasing a man sexually, from these boys. I was curious and experimented, trying all kinds of techniques and soon was confident that I knew what I was doing with the male organ.
Then, I moved to the Netherlands, a country of cheese, tulips, and uncircumcised men. Perhaps it was generational, as I am told that the older men are indeed "snipped", but every penis I encountered still had its carrying case. I didn't think this would pose a problem, as once you pull the foreskin back, it was just like any other dick, but I was so very wrong.
I soon discovered that men who still possess that extra piece of skin are much more sensitive on and around the head. While, again, I wrongly assumed this would be a benefit, in fact, they explained that it was too sensitive for the techniques I was using. My bag of tricks was all wrong for this country, and even the continent.
Finally, I asked one of my partners to masturbate in front of me, so I could see what he was doing. It seemed so much easier than what the guys with that attractive, cut member had to do. He grabbed hold of his cock about halfway along the shaft, and seemed to just roll the foreskin over the head of his cock. At long last it clicked for me, it was way easier to please a man with his tool intact.
There was no need for lubricant with a hand job, no need to worry about finding the right grip for friction and an easy slide; foreskin does all the work for you. It's just a matter of grabbing on and pumping away. It didn't make the men over sensitive and didn't require pulling the skin back in any way. And, because it was easier with an uncircumcised man, I could focus my attentions on other actions he might enjoy.
Of course my other skills were important – speed, tightness of grip, and any oral action that accompanied this, but I had figured out the European cock. It was a revelation, and made me see it in a whole new way. I had been raised to believe the circumcision kept men cleaner, and that it made the dick more attractive. But, it does not make a different for hygiene as long as the man showers on a regular basis (which Europeans do, contrary to American belief) and knows how to clean himself.
I soon came to prefer a man who still had his foreskin. I knew how to please him more easily, and these men always seemed so surprised at my skill with the man flesh. I still think it looks funny when the man is flaccid, but I like it now; it looks cute and vulnerable. Now, I see it as a representation of the man, strong and hard on the one hand, but weak and vulnerable on the other. On the whole, the experience gave me greater appreciation of a man's member in general, and ended up giving me a whole new bag of tricks.
Now, when exploring a man's body, I do not have the same judgments as I once did. I'm happy when I find chest hair, pleased by broad shoulders and strong arms, regardless of the degree of muscle definition. But most importantly, I am overjoyed when I discover that he still has that extra piece of skin. It's not much, but it now makes a world of difference. Maybe it's experience, or maybe I really am integrating into the local culture.
Please Rate This Submission:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Recent
Comments - Add a
Comment - Send
Feedback Send private anonymous feedback to the author (click here to post a public comment instead).
Circumcised as An Adult at Age 24
There are various reasons why males are still circumcised - religion, custom (like father like son), hygiene, aesthetics etc. It is a surgical procedure that goes back thousands of years.
I was circumcised by choice at age 24. I had issues with yeast infections and a very tight and short frenulum that would hurt upon erection. My family doctor referred me to a urologist after I went through several yeast infections that did not respond well to either topical or oral antibiotics. The urologist examined me and suggested a circumcision as he said he would have to remove the frenulum anyway, and with a full circumcision I would not get anymore infections as the foreskin would be completely removed. I had considered circumcision already, having done plenty of research on the internet. I decided to go ahead with the full circumcision and he removed the frenulum and widened the urethral opening that was partly constricted due to the placement of the frenulum band right over my urethral opening.
Many in activists have gone to great lengths to talk about scientific research that they claim supports their thoughts that circumcision removes most of the sensitive tissue from the penis, resulting in what many anti-circumcision advocates call "a sexually mutilated penis". What is ridiculous is that there is proven scientific evidence that also says there's absolutely NO difference in penile sensation in either men with foreskin or without. We are NEVER going to agree on sensitivity as it's such a very subjective experience. Some anti-circumcision activists say that the majority of men who were circumcised as adults experience a tremendous loss in penile sensitivity - I would challenge that claim as many other scientific documents are contrary to that claim and challenge the notion that the removal of the foreskin removes the most nerves on the penis. New scientific evidence says there's no proof that the foreskin or the ringed band at the opening of the foreskin contains any more nerve endings than the glans of shaft of the penis. In fact, new studies show that it is the glans that contains the most nerve endings and the foreskin has no more than the shaft. Other reports show that men are saying that there's either no loss after undergoing an adult circumcision or there's actually MORE sensitivity after being circumcised.
As for my own personal experience I find my orgasms far more intense after being circumcised and I can now control my ejaculation timing far better to match my partners.
I am extremely happy and proud to be circumcised and I think anti-circumcision activists do nobody any favors by referring to male infant circumcision as rape, mutilation and sexual disfigurement.more...
Show more comments or
Read All 15 User Comments or
Click here to leave your own comment on this submission!