The Problem with Monsanto

Story Info
Decrease of genetic diversity in food crops.
902 words
4.46
12.8k
0
Share this Story

Font Size

Default Font Size

Font Spacing

Default Font Spacing

Font Face

Default Font Face

Reading Theme

Default Theme (White)
You need to Log In or Sign Up to have your customization saved in your Literotica profile.
PUBLIC BETA

Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.

You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.

Click here
JagFarlane
JagFarlane
311 Followers

According to the calendar, despite the fact that there is a growing layer of snow upon the soil outside my house, it's supposed to be Spring. With Spring there's the promise of many things, warmer weather, flowers blooming, and fresh fruits and vegetables on their way. For many homeowners this means dealing with their lawns and in particular, dealing with the perceived weeds that spring up in unwanted places. To deal with the unwanted weeds many folks will turn to using the popular solution of herbicides, perhaps the best well known of these being Round-Up. Many farmers will also turn to using this popular herbicide to protect their crops from invading weeds. Who produces this chemical? A company called Monsanto, a name that has become rather infamous over the years as it's been entwined with another phrase, genetically modified organism or GMO. While the consumption of GMO products has been heavily debated, there is another concern about the heavy use of this product that hasn't been so well addressed, the lack of genetic diversity created by the use of GMO products.

Who is Monsanto? Simply put they are a company that either produces or owns other companies that produce various herbicides and seeds. They produce seeds for products like corn, sugar cane, soybeans, wheat, canola, and others. This company also produces herbicides like Round-up and Lariat. They came across the idea in the 1990's to genetically modify their food crops to be resistant to their herbicides. For the company it was a stroke of genius, for the rest of humanity it will prove to have dire consequences in the long term. I understand that yes, in the short term it's worked well to massively increase production of base food crops, it's the long term that it seems few are willing to consider, particularly those who really should be looking at it.

Diversity is nature's way of ensuring survival of a species despite harsh, changing conditions. It's a basic survival trait that has been taken advantage of by farmers since the beginning of the Neolithic Revolution about 12,000 years ago. The system works, it allows for growth of a species to combat the various challenges of an area it's grown in. If there is heavy weed growth that steals a vital nutrient only versions of that crop that can withstand the weeds will survive. Yet this system was bypassed by the invention of Round-up Ready seeds, seeds that had a gene spliced in to allow them to withstand Round-Up. Well, how's that different you might ask? Simply it's the problem that eventually some weeds will survive and their species will adapt to being resistant. By that time however, farmers will have become adjusted to doing things one way and will be hard pressed to keep up production while having to adapt to dealing with the new weeds.

How do I know this will happen? Well, that's because it already has and is already putting a large strain on an agricultural system taxed by droughts, floods, and a booming population. In 2010 Round-up Ready crops accounted for upwards of 70% of the United States corn and 90% of soybean crops, setting up the system for severe problems. It was also about that time that Round up resistant horseweed, pigweed, ragweed, etc., started to appear. It doesn't take a genius to realize that this is going to become a large problem, yet these chemical companies keeping offering modified seeds made to match with their herbicides.

In the meantime farmers who have tried to grow crops that aren't GMO have struggled with the problem that their crops often end up cross pollinating with their neighbors GMO products. To add insult to injury, not only are these farmers crops not what they wanted but often times Monsanto will then sue them claiming the farmers have stolen Monsanto's product. It's a situation that has put a large number of farmers who would prefer to grow non-GMO crops out of the business and further reduced our supply of seeds in different varieties.

Primarily the reason that Monsanto has chosen to pursue these solutions is in the end, money. Yes they will spout off some noble ideas of feeding humanity and being sustainable. If spraying large loads of chemicals into the ground and profiting heavily while billions around the world starve due to lack of economically priced food is their goal then they've achieved it, otherwise they need to just shut their mouths.

As this world's population continues to grow past seven billion people it's become very important that we keep a close eye on the agriculture industry and how it will be able to meet the food requirements for future generations. The manner in which Monsanto has chosen to meet these goals falls short in the long run, as it's just a temporary fix and it's already wearing off as nature has evolved to meet the challenge. What is needed is a solution that doesn't rely on soaking the ground in chemicals that require hazmat suits to apply but are then ingested by the consumer and a solution that is capable of being used in a manner that does not harm the environment. We need to put more money and more effort into finding this solution and tell companies like Monsanto that we the consumer will not support them profiting off destroying the ecosystem and endangering our food supply.

JagFarlane
JagFarlane
311 Followers
Please rate this story
The author would appreciate your feedback.
  • COMMENTS
Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous
19 Comments
AnonymousAnonymousabout 2 years ago

This essay is full of debunked claims and practically a case study in deployment or repetition if the most common logical fallacies.

The fact is that counties that now feed themselves, for example India and China, as well as the majority of Africa can only do so with GMO. Why? because GMO crops produce vastly more per acre, vastly more per gallon of water, and use LESS, not more, pesticides.

AnonymousAnonymousalmost 11 years ago
Just "a chip" of the iceburg

Bad food, air, electrical harmonics, medicine, and gun control are part of a bigger problem. Its time we used our 9th amendment rights to keep our 2nd amendment rights to protect our 1st amendment rights to preserve our 4th amendment rights. In 1933 the Constitution Republic of the United States was replaced with a CORPORATE DEMOCRACY as the nation was bankrupted and sold to the global bankers for 11 million in gold. (At that time only 8 million in gold was known to exist.) Anyway, people are starting to wakeup and it is scaring the global bankers. So, the UN has adopted Agenda 21 to control the global population as not to be removed from power. So, our food is designed to kill us slowly while robbing us financially. Chemicals and bio-hazards are sprayed from planes into our air. Our electrical grid, gas, and water are being upgraded to Smart Meters which are designed to attack our nervous systems with microwaves. Many wireless devices follow suite. Allopathic medicine was selected and funded to be our managed death-care system as it eats our checkbook. Our managed population reduction is in Agenda 21. And In Many More Ways! Please note that Obama doesn't even pretend to follow the Constitution any more because he is actually the king of America and CEO of the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA under admiralty law. No wonder why politicians ignore the people as of late. The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction under admiralty law so they keep finding loops to hide in to avoid telling the people out right what happened. Food for thought

AnonymousAnonymousalmost 11 years ago
It's easy to blame Monsanto for all of our problems

You do have valid points, but you seem to be only pointing to the finger at Monsanto and similar companies as the only parties responsible for all the problems when the issue isn't that simple at all.

Like what one poster had said, agriculture is a business. Companies like Monsanto would've gone out of business long ago if people stopped buying their products because of environmental concerns. You can't really blame them for seeking economical solutions. Many farming businesses are caught at an endless downward spiral of competition and would seek every advantage to stay afloat. And who are allowing these companies like Monsanto to continue doing what they're doing? It's the government, farmers, and the consumers!

It's funny you would even compare weeds in a lawn with weeds in a farm. It's easy to deal with weeds using safe, traditional methods (like pulling it up with your hands) if the area in concern is small, but try that in a farm! It's going to take forever.

Finally, you can't solve the problem without finding a solution first. Unless you can find a method that's safe, effective, and economical, people would continue using Monsanto's pesticides. If you're suggesting of going back to using neolithic technology, you're naive. Ancient farming practices would only be able support a small population, not to mention costs were much cheaper back then because society was smaller and simpler. Still, many ancient societies collapsed at the times when they were desperately trying to maximize their crop yields in order to support the population. In today's modern society, you have so many layers of administration and bureacracy regulating everything that doing everything is expensive.

AnonymousAnonymousalmost 11 years ago
Interesting

I didn't really expect to find such an article on this site. As a 40 plus year farmer who has followed organic practices since I was a teenager, I have to agree with most of what the author writes. Monsanto and the companies that have been licensed to use Big M's technology are driving family farms, as we know them, out of business. I believe there is an argument as to whether GM crops will really "save the world from hunger" or in the long run make it worse. It seems like about the same amount of pesticides are being used if not more then before RR (Roundup Ready) seeds came on the market. I believe the jury is still out on if gyphosphate (Roundup) is as safe as originally thought.

One note on the article, Monsanto has GM sugar BEET seed, not sugar cane.

AnonymousAnonymousalmost 11 years ago
What else is new?

All done for greed. Nobody cares if the food you eat kills, as long as they can line their pockets. High fructose replaced sugar. Greed. GMO replaced heritage. Greed. Chemicals replaced manure. Greed. Greed. Greed. People kill for the almighty dollar. That's just the way it is. Corporations are people my friend, haven't you heard. Politicians are the puppets of greed. greed. greed. It will never change, only get worse.

Show More
Share this Story

Similar Stories

My Special Recipe Do you like the taste of cum...in your dinner?in Fetish
Gabby The Boss sets employee up with his niece.in Erotic Couplings
Amusing Train Ride A Gentleman has an odd encounter on a long train ride.in NonHuman
Home for the Holidays War-weary soldier meets lady who raised his morale.in Erotic Couplings
Kim and Me Ch. 01 He finally gets a clue & makes love to old friend.in Erotic Couplings
More Stories