All Comments on '3 some'

This is some pretty awful art. Ugh.

Of the half dozen or so "illustrators" in this section, YOURS is by FAR the most sophisticated. Although I've seen this style many times before, your execution, draftmanship, and composition put you ahead of your "rivals''---not that art is a silly contest. Continue to WORK, WORK, WORK......furiously; there is so little time.....

I find it fascinating that the last 2 comments are at complete odds with each other. I can totally see why. The 1st comment (which was not at all helpful) speaks to the "primitive" nature of the style and the non-idealized figures (balding man, nearly masculine women). The 2nd poster has gone waaaay to the other end of the spectrum, by seeing the composition, the layering of the figures, the choice of flat colors for those figures.

I hope people can learn from imagery that is not necessarily to their tastes.

Though these works are "erotic" in the sense that they are somewhat sexual in nature, I prefer a bit more fantasy to my erotica, not always "perfection" or "idealization", but I also want to be attracted to it as well as aroused by it. Of course this raises the question of "porn"/"erotica"/"art". :)

Ordinary people having extraordinary sex. Very erotic. It conveys the moment.

<img src="http://cscscs.hostoi.com/logo31.jpg">Very good

Threesomes are good when there are boy/boy/girl or boy/boy/boy. Oh, for the good old days!