Eroticism (A Matter Of Context)

A learned and witty presentation

The erotic has countless manifestations, but an end point might be defined as the impulse that precedes the action, even if the action doesn't occur beyond our minds - your wife's wicked smile and partial exposure of her breast. That was all erotic impulse on her part, and erotic impulse was your recognition and engagement in the moment. We don't really have to know what action, if any, followed. The impulse and the context was one and the same. Being in a restaurant is incidental background.

I have fucked women doggie style many times, and your summation of the primitive lust, dominance, control, careless freedom to pound away - absent any communication face to face has to offer - is accurate enough. But that too is erotic impulse, in a specific context, that precedes the liberated vigor of pounding away. And that is the male point of view. What of the female?

If she really likes doggie, her position is one of total submission, and that alone is an erotic impulse of intense substance and scope. It not only precedes the action, but for her part internally shapes and defines it. Romance has no place. Liberation and pure sexual experience is all. Of course she can have that same impulse of erotic submission face to face - she is the recepticle in each context - but in doggie her erotic impulse of submission is raised several notches. It is no surprise if she falls into shouting brazen slutty words.