All Comments on 'Lavalamp'

by toepicdic

Sort by:
  • 5 Comments
rublicksrublicksover 11 years ago
and you called this non erotic?

great premise i liked it,but could go on and on

doodlesdaddoodlesdadover 11 years ago
Get an editor

If you're going to do this again, for God's sake get an editor. This is barely in English.

AnonymousAnonymousover 11 years ago
Quite a good tale.

For which i thank you. Was reasonably well-writ, the one and only thing I picked up on was one spelling of florescent, in lieu of fluorescent. Florescent is to do with flower buds, Fluorescent is a glowing light.

Cheers, and Thanks.

Kilroy

AnonymousAnonymousover 11 years ago
Agree about the need for an editor

This was all but illiterate. Seriously, get an editor. Learn some writing technique.

Yecch...

chytownchytownover 11 years ago
Funny!!!!!

Sometimes you just need to sit down and write something what ever it maybe. And a lot of us will read and enjoy it. Thanks for sharing.

Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous