Santa, All I Want For Xmas is a Job

Economists can't do reproducable experiments, so it is not a "natural" science.

Economics can only "prove" things deductively. All deductive proofs begin with things proven with reproducable experiments or with assumptions that are not proven, they are assumed. So, economists all begin with assumptions and prove things from them.

Euclid, in his classic proofs of Plane Geometry, began with what in English are called definitions, axioms, and postulates. These words are just different words for assumptions. But, Euclid did it right. He put all the assumptions at the start of his work for all to see. Everyone could decide for themselves if they thought any of his assumptions was false. This is important because if any premis/assumption in a proof is not true then the proof is worthless, the conclusion can't be proven with false assumptions.

Have any of you readers ever seen a complete list of the assumptions that any school of economics uses to make its proofs? I haven't, in fact I have never seen even a shot list. The assumptions I have seen were mostly all false, in my opinion.

Therefore, I deduse that economists are trying to pull wool over the worlds eyes. They claim to prove things, but hide their assumptions. This is a sign that they are lying.

The thing is that economics matters in the real world in the lives of every person in a modern nation. The theory used to decide what the government does helps some and hurts others. Because of that there is a strong tendency for economists to decide what their patrons want proven and then set out to prove that (hiding any false assumptions they must use to do it).

The current economic theory used by the US Gov. and the EU and the World Bank, etc. is wrong. Austerity does not balance budgets. It can't because before there is there is enough pain in the street to do it, there are riots in those streets. The government falls and another takes its place. In fact US Federal gov. defits are necessary to add "money" to the banking system (in peoples' and comps'. deposits) there by letting everyone add to their savings year after year. Running a Fed. gov. surplus is a horrible thing. The last time we did it we got the recession of the early Bush II years. In fact the gov. has run a surplus for a couple of years straight just 8 times in all of US history. Every single time there was a "Bank Panic", recession, or depression. Every single time. Eight out of 8. That should tell you something.

If you want to see a better economic theory google "MMT & Prof. Wray". That will get you to Modern Money Theory. I'll be frank with you. All main stream economists and politicians say it is just bunk. That doesn't make it wrong because most of those people can't see the truth of what I wrote above; that is, that 1 false assumption destroys the proof and economists use many false assumptions in their proofs. I hope some of you will at least look at what you can easily find with google and decide for yoursevles.

I am desperately trying to say something that makes sense but can't because the world no longer makes sense. You have certainly written an extremely poignant letter laced at the end with some well written humor, but blowjobs given out desperation can not make laugh, nor should they be a turn on for anyone, they can only break my heart. As to all the social issues I have no answers, hell I don't even no the questions. The piece deserved all the 5,s because of the excellent writing and passions evoked. I started to comment on political issues, but decided to relay something that a mentor told me, "Before you look for our government to take care of you, look at the American Indians". I only know that every social program the government has become involved in they fucked up.

I have lived the unemployment part. I have had to work below my talent for 10 years, but at least I have work. My spirit is broken and I hide online for long periods of time. Nevertheless, government is not to blame, nor is it part of the solution. I don't know what would fix the political and economic situation, but I sure admire a woman who is willing to take Santa's throbbing cock to her warm mouth. The prospect of a fantasy becoming real keeps many of us alive. You got my five.

I'll be wishing for you too. Good luck :/

Thank you to everyone who read, vote, and/or commented on my story.

Your voting support and feedback is much appreciated.

I like your story. It's very exciting.

It's rare to read such a story on this site. Thanks for

articulating what many are thinking out there.

I'm just going to quote you in one of your own comments "This is a story that needed to be written. Too many of the unemployed walk around with their hands in their pockets and their heads down. As a writer, I'm here to tell all those who do not have a job, it's not your fault." ~andtheend

Amen! You did a great job and I and many others thank you for this! The beginning had me a bit teary-eyed, but then the humor brought me back and made me laugh :)

I hope you post this elsewhere, even try to submit it to publications or media. (Not the the media would EVER accept such truth!)

~Luna

Hi Susan Harris

Im Terryn a hot 66 guy from and in ohio. I would love to give you that job, with all the experience of living in this here usa . the ability to read the papers and all that youve cum up with Susan

so thanks and i would love that blowjob and cumm in your mouth with all your expertise that would be awesome Susan, youve done your homework of life here in the us so congrats on the fine job, your very well qualified and any girl that would give the blowjob you described has my vote

kisses and hugs and rewards

your friend

Santa Terry

i even gave you a 5 star rating Susan Harris

Enjoy all your writing.

George