All Comments on 'Paul's Goblins'

it's high dudgeon, not dungeon. also, teeming, not teaming. other than that, very enjoyable!

So many things don't add up here. Why did Laurie go around with this unshakable, ironclad belief that Paul was married without any real evidence? Plenty of guys with kids (even had they turned out to really be his kids after all) are single, after all. Surely it was worth at least asking? And why did Paul, knowing perfectly well himself he wasn't married, never bother to approach this obviously mutually interested woman, particularly when their encounter at the party provided such an ideal platform? It seems they held out on even the most basic, stencil-outline form of making a move just for the sake of the story.

For all that, it's a perfectly okay tale: Droll, grounded, and written with confident and illustrative prose that never wastes our time. Writing-wise, it's good, even charming. But I don't fully buy this plot.

is demeaning and not true of the power women have in the U.S., at least, today.

Oh, the poor "lady's" looking for an available guy.

Right. This or any man will be LUCKY to get a well-educated, independent woman who'll even look at them.

Idiots. Go for girls/women too poor not to look up to you.

You men obviously don't know the political relations TODAY between women and men.

Hint: Men aren't on top.

So, "Sorry Anonymous" can't accept that a woman could be free enough to be lusty and open to seeing what she wants and going for it? She certainly wouldn't be a "proper lady" if she didn't know and stay in her demur place, right? Sounds like you're as conditioned by the feminist movement of the last century as those really comfortable being on Literotica can be. I wrote this to entertain, not to fall into your literalist, narrow-minded PC sense of the box a woman should stay in.

My tablet's screen turned while voting and now I gave it a two instead of a five! Good job, 4Glory6..