by Koba
I'm not getting it, in both senses of the meaning.
First time I've seen your work 100
20 years or so down the road when Watson's grandchild wins the money, goes to the opera and maybe even falls in love. But I like the passion of this poem and the indignant sense that a computer can never really best a human...we shall see!
....Watson too and smiled when he deemed Toronto to be in the U.S., perhaps he knows something we mere mortals don't! :-o
Tess, who liked it.
as this is something we know not of over here in our benighted isle. Some nice words though.
will never smile or salivate at a beautiful poem. Wait, maybe if Isaac Asimov's vision comes true. I do love the implication that a machine will never replace the soul of humanity.
Ken Jennings was ahead... wow. I guess this is a case of art mimicking real life??
jth : )
I like to believe that there are some areas where computers will never be able to match us, but its hard to be definitive about it.
Looking at both computers and people, it comes down more to the software than the hardware. We wrote the computer's software, including its learning capability, who wrote ours?
This is a great poem. Very deep and complex. I found the rhythm a little jerky and weird though. I am giving it five and a recommend though.
Duh, I was is serious dumb mode yesterday. Watson. popped back, just to tell you it looks better today. I gave you a 100 already, and it is not you nor the poem, but you do have to be careful with things like "Watson", here it is perfect. But like I said, I was in serious dumb mode yesterday.