Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.
You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.
Click hereWith each thrust she sucked my cock further inside her. I released her tits and grabbed her hips as my orgasm grew.
Marcie's thrusts became savage. I tried to buck my hips upward to drive my cock further inside her, but Marcie's thighs closed around my waist and she bore down with her full weight making my movements impossible. Suddenly, her thrusting stopped, she grabbed both of my arms and, using them as leverage, she ground herself down onto my hips with tremendous pressure. Her face contorted as she concentrated on bringing us both to orgasm simultaneously.
The fire in my groin exploded. I felt the sperm course up my cock and into her pussy.
"Oh yes," I moaned as I pulled her hips into me. "Oh god, yes! Yeeeeeees"
She ground her hips into me until I could feel her cervix against the head of my cock. My sperm continued to pour into her, one convulsion after another. Time ended and my consciousness was focused only on that moment.
As my cock pulsed inside her pussy, Marcie dug her nails into my arms and continued to grind her body down onto my cock. A shudder, which began in her hips, rose to shake her tits until finally Marcie threw back her head and emitted a loud moan that transitioned into a soft, primal scream.
Marcie sat rigid above me until her scream died in her throat and she collapsed onto me with my cock still buried deep inside her. Without releasing any pressure on my hips, I felt Marcie massage my cock with her pelvic muscles; milking every drop of sperm out of me. Both of us were panting heavily with my arms around her and her hands firmly holding my head between them.
After what seemed like a long time, Marcie breathed, "Phew!" and passionately kissed me on the mouth.
"Ditto," I chuckled, and returned her kiss.
We lay that way for a long time and then Marcie rolled off of me. We both heard the soft "plop" as my cock fell out of her pussy and we laughed. She then rose up on one elbow, bent her head down and began to lick the combination of my cum and her own juices off of my dick. As she cleaned me up she looked into my eyes and gave me the most heart-exploding smile and evil wink.
- COMMENTS
Anonymousover 3 years agoI was in my mid to late 30s when I finally became aware of both my quite strong voyeur side and the fact it intensely turns me on when other men aggressively flirt with my wife.
When a man caresses my wife's knee or the love handle above her hip bone, I get totally mesmerized & don't want to intervene: I am in a trance of sorts in those moments.
26thNCover 4 years agoMonogamy is not complicated. It means one man, one woman, no others. Pretty straightforward.
sbrooks103xabout 7 years agoHey, not my thing, but if consenting adults want to bring others in, and if it works for them, fine. Just don't try to tell me that they're monogamous!
As I said to Joe, it's like me eating meat and telling you that I'm still a vegetarian, that I just define vegetarianism differently!
jjrocker4449about 7 years agoI totally can relate to this turn on and the deeper meaning between animal lust/physical enjoyment and true deep love for your mate. Don't let these others put you down for that...enjoyed the read...nice job...would like to see part 4
Anonymousabout 7 years agoMonogamy is simple. You dedicate yourself to one person and only fuck them. Simple!
Swinging, sharing, poly- , etc. Are complicated as you're adding multiple variables to the situation.
The only way your title makes sense is if you're doing that bullshit SJW/feminist thing where you're redefining words to fit your nonsense message. You fail!
MaFreplerabout 7 years agoAs a married man for 27 years, I can tell you that marriage and romantic love are not about making your partner happy, or enabling them to achieve their dreams, or live their fantasies. Marriage is about sharing a life with another person, and by that sharing making each of you a better person. It's a choice. Romantic love is about wanting to be with that one person more than anyone else, and marriage is about choosing to be with that person exclusively. So if you want to be with someone else, or choose to be with someone else, then by definition you don't truly love your partner. At least not as fully and deeply as people in a loving committed relationship. It's not complicated at all. It just conflicts with getting what you want whenever you want it, however you want it. But that's the point of living with someone. The way this impacts the story is that the wife knows this. because most people know it implicitly or else they have seen it or learned it. So she should be calling BS on this guy from the get go. Why husband thinks that an open marriage is a good idea is barely plausible. Why she goes along with it is not.
sbrooks103xabout 7 years agoI guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
To ME, if a man and a woman tell me that they are in a monogamous relationship, married or not, that means that NEITHER of them have an intimate relationship with another person, regardless of sex or permission.
If my wife has sex with another woman, with my approval, we are no longer monogamous, in my MOST humble opinion. It doesn't mean that we don't still love and are committed to each other, just that we are no longer monogamous.
swingerjoeabout 7 years agoIn this chapter of the story (and the next), a man has sex with one and only one woman. Under what definition of "monogamy" does this story violate that term? I've said it before, but I'll say it again: folks seem to comment more on the story's tags than the story itself!
Re. the term "monogamy", if you scroll through dozens and dozens of comments, you'll see that some Anony claimed that the word "monogamy" means "having sex with only one person" (or something to that extent.) My point was that "monogamy" has nothing to do with sex. It's about commitment, loyalty, trust, love, etc.. "Monogamy" refers to a marriage to one person. "Marriage" can means many different things to many different people.
As others have pointed out, the comments are often more interesting than the story. That's certainly true of this story (so far.)
sbrooks103xabout 7 years agoMaybe I misused the "strawman" term, but what I meant, and I'm sure you realize this, is that what was under discussion sexual exclusivity, and you decided to cloud the issue by throwing other kinds of exclusivity into the mix.
Yes, we can agree on that.
And what it has to do with this story, is that it claims to be about monogamy when it obviously isn't!
swingerjoeabout 7 years agoI think too many people toss around terms like "strawman" without really knowing what they mean. I didn't make a strawman argument. I made a valid point that you danced around by twisting its meaning.
I'll try to make this point a little more explicitly. If your definition of "monogamy" includes sexual exclusivity, and if this definition is shared by both partners in a monogamous relationship, and if one of those partners then has sex with someone outside of that relationship without the expressed consent and knowledge of the other partner, then it's no longer monogamy, trust has been broken, and a grave injustice has occurred.
Can we agree to that?
If so, then...what does any of that have to do with this story?
To the author: having fun? Welcome to Loving Wives!
sbrooks103xabout 7 years agoNice strawman, Joe!
I think MOST of us are talking about SEXUAL exclusivity here!
How many times have we heard the wife saying "It's just sex, it's YOU I love!" Most of us call bullshit, we don't CARE that she's "emotionally exclusive," she broke the promise of "sexual exclusivity" that MOST of us consider part and parcel of a monogamous relationship.
As for ANY tripod relationship, yes, I would imagine that if ALL parties agreed then a fourth party could be added, then they would be exclusive among the four of them, but once again, it is NOT monogamy, no matter now much the original husband and wife want to pretend that it is.
Anonymousabout 7 years agoYou are wasting your time. Loving wives is a popularity contest. No use making valid points. Kimi/ BR are in agreement with the majority, so the LW Community will overlook any inconsistencies. I think Kimi's tripod relationship is really just another jab at how dumb she perceives everyone else to be. The two way lesbian relationship is really her two alter egos, and the third is her husband. How else do you explain the inconsistencies in her lifestyle and her attitude against alternative lifestyles in general? But hey, who am i to put puzzle pieces together?
The point is, the people don't care about truth. They only care about disagreeing, even if its just for the sake of it. You won't get credit for making valid points because they just want to disagree with you.
Open your eyes.
swingerjoeabout 7 years ago"No, Joe, there is only one way to define exclusivity. You are either exclusive or you are not."
Well, no, actually. There is sexual exclusivity, romantic exclusivity, emotional exclusivity, etc.. Just because you define "exclusivity" to mean sexual exclusivity doesn't mean everyone must do the same. To each his own. Live and let live.
Kimi's sexual relationship with two partners is presumably exclusive to those two. There are PLENTY of folks who would insist that anything other than a man-and-woman exclusive relationship is sick and perverted and not "exclusive" at all. What if Kimi, her boyfriend, and girlfriend all decide to incorporate another "exclusive" partner into their mix? Would it still be exclusive? Or do we stop at the number three for some arbitrary reason?
My original point (which continues to sail over the heads of the Literotti) was that just because a couple has sex with others outside of their relationship doesn't mean they aren't committed to each other in every other aspect. For too many readers here, it seems that where someone puts his or her naughty parts is far more important than anything else a marriage involves.
