by Nemasis Enforcer
Using the generic term, "The Girl" added too much distance, rendering what could have been erotic generic and ordinary.
Without "that girl" having a name, made it hard to get involved in the story, although very good, it was a bit like hearing evidence read in a court, only difference was you used "the girl" instead of the defendant. Other than that I liked the story but it needed more build up to the girl & she needed some sort of a personality she was portrayed just an object like the wifes hidden toy.
on the Lit Forum, Author's Hangout, New Story Reviews thread, as a "Blast From the Past".
This sounds like my fantasy, and I didn't mind the girl not having a name. Made it seem more possible that an anonymous woman could be found to fulfill my own erotic dreams with my hubby looking on. The descriptions were great, really enjoyed this story. Just not sure my hubby would go for it...but what a great thought of the possibilities! If only...
though not great. What's the attraction, its not far from a whimp/cuckold story (which is not hot at all). Who cares what the girl's name is, My issue is that the wife gets to play but hubby can't! The whole setup was to one sided. A hot story would have had the hubby coming up behind the girl and porking her while she eat his wife. Seriously as its written you have to wonder if next weekend she'll be bringing home studs. Whatever, its just a story and people's tastes differ, but if they both can't play then what's the point?
His wife is Bi. At the very least. And whether it is a man or a woman, his wife has just finished rubbing her husband's face in her infidelity. A totally one-sided proposition to say the least. And one that will be repeated behind her husband's back until he realizes his wife isn't satisfied with him and their marriage is over. Stupid story about stupid people doing stupid things. Is ANY man THAT stupid? Laughably bad story with no thought given to consequences.
1 star