All Comments on 'Taking Advantage of Jessica'

"Rape" is defined is "penetration without consent." Overcoming "consent" can be by force, or by coercion. I don't like stories where somebody in a position of authority uses that position to obtain sexual benefits from another person who is subordinate, or otherwise in a position where the other person cannot object to the "penetration"

This story is classified as Non-Consent. If you don't like these types of stories, why did you read it?

I agree totally with the second comment: the element of non-consent is clearly signalled, so why read the story unless you're a total cretin?

Sure seems to me she didn't put up that much of a fight.

i think you should publish another and maybe get the wife involved

She really didn't put up that much of a protest And humiliated? Seems she got what she wanted. Though him fucking her then rolling off her probably took a bit of the shine off the whole fantasy.

Non-Consent/Reluctance.

To the last couple comments, if the story wasn't "non-consent" enough for you (whereas it was clearly TOO non-consensual for the first person to comment), then surely you'll agree that it falls under "Reluctance". This story was accurately categorized. Based on the title and category, it was exactly what I expected it to be.

I like...no, I love the reluctant/giving in plot lines. But what about foreplay?? I do like the seduction aspect too...and the exploration of the female body!! But understandingly so...this WAS the first time too...so it was given to lust and desire. Maybe (and this is just MY opinion), maybe u can spend some time exploring her young college body...

I love the plot, but the story really needed to be longer. You needed much more foreplay and maybe have the girl come back for round two