All Comments on 'Owed two a spell chequer'

Unbelievable!

In writing this, I was not trying to poke fun at anyone, but to illustrate some of the pitfalls that any one of us can fall into!

the way of weigh, tend to agree more with Kolkore than LeBroz.

You illustrate your point flawlessly!

Yore rightin' maid mea guff aw. Tank ewe!

...and I understand why the collection of found objects (mistakes) was supposed to be humorous. For some reason it just did not do it for me (perhaps it has to do with the heavy presentation of what amounts to a collection of technical mistakes).

Congrats on the little 'greenie'. This is a very densely woven display of the dangers inherent with spell checkers when coming to grips with homophones. In fact, there are so many homophones that it almost presents itself as a challenge to read and seems to lessen the impact of the message by its over-the-top display. Today, there are too many instances of confusion by writers as to which word they wish to use: to, too, two; its, it's; bear, bare; boar, bore; your, you're; board, bored; vein, vain; loose, lose, loss; and the list goes on...

I never liked poking fun at others' short comings. But if you make fun of the blind the deaf or the mentally disabled your poem will be applauded.

has been reommended in today's New Poems Review thread on Literotica's Poetry Feedback and Discussion forum. Thanks for the read!