All Comments on 'An Open Book'

This isn't Group Sex this is Gay Rape/Non Consent.

Its not badly written or described, but its in totally the wrong section.

More attention to detail please, if you mislead your audience then they won't come back.

First, as I've mentioned before, authors don't get to choose the categories, the editor's do. I myself have had three stories placed in categories different from the one I suggested. This one could have gone under "group," "nonconsent," "anal," or virtually any other category. This one though, seems the most appropriate: when three or more people are engaged in sex, it's known as a "group sex," regardless of what kind of sex they're having. There's nothing in the definition of the category that excludes non-consensual, coerced sex, or blackmail.

What's more, there are no gay people in the story, so that category doesn't fit at all. If you're suggesting that nonconsensual sex between men is somehow "gay," then you're just an idiot. Gay sex involves gay people, and is generally as consenual as any other kind.

"Nonconsent" might be an appropriate category, but who cares? You haven't been "misled" by calling it group sex, unless you're unclear on what that word means. And even if you were confused, you're reading porn! Get over it!

Agree and disagree with both previous commentators. I liked the writing. But as pure porn it would have really worked for me if the little guy had been able to fuck the magnificent teacher in the ass. On the other hand would have loved it if one or both HUGE BLACK COCKS had stretched that nasty teacher's anus. And there you have it!

Nonconsent and humiliation are into this warped thought process. All he needs is a small hand gun and this would be over.

Most guys who hated this story would have loved it if the narrator had been female. And yes, the editor (not the writer's fault) did place it in the wrong section.