by Charles Petersunn
Really enjoy your stories, but do all the females have to be described as looking like "so 'n so". When you go from Donna Reed (50's and 60's) to Reese Whitherspoon (21st Century), there have to some of us saying "Who is that?" You know how to use the language. "five foot six with light brown hair in a boy-cut that highlighted the ivory skin of her soft, oval face." I don't care if she looks like someone I've nevr heard of. Thanks. Send us more!
concluded with an erotic gush of emotion and lust. Very interesting scenario. Your use of detail is amazing, yet one wonders why there are so many errors. Misspelled and misused words, people (such as Mr. Peters) in the wrong story, and others. As an accomplished writer, you should spend a little time in the chore of proof-reading - spell checks just don't get it. But your stories and varied themes that accommodate the characteristics of the participants are very interesting, and, of course, erotic.
you never completed this one... please do... u shd write for the movies.. a younger gabrielle hall could do wendy...
This is just so cliche' and dull. And the constant facial cumshots are getting old too. Doesn't anybody put cum where it belongs? It makes less of a mess that way. For example in a previous chapter Tina and Gordon were in a set bedroom behind the curtain in the auditorium. He shot his cum on her face and made a mess that nearly got them caught. If he'd have put it in her cunny or better yet, she swallowed it, Ron wouldn't have walked in with her still having a 'milk-moustache' to arouse suspicions. Besides, whats the appeal? It seems demeaning to women. Grow up and put it where it belongs!