All Comments on 'A Beast in the Bedroom'

But why does it keep getting reposted as new

Admin made me edit it because the fictional animal wasn’t fictional enough.

I was constantly wondering about the physical attributes of the gargoyle. All his dismensions are relvant.

Utterly disgusting. The way George corrupts the sanctity of marriage by having an dumb animal mate with Kitty is worthy of old testament fire and brimstone. The way he acts as if it were perfectly natural is very creepy and repulsive. The final straw is how George refuses to even consummate his own marriage. I think I would have liked the story more if Albert and George were the same person, Jeckel and Hyde style, at least that way love would have a possibility of flourishing instead a mere beast rutting, a woman in despair and a psychopath doing nothing but evil. As it is now, the sheer evil of the story overwhelms any sense of erotic interest.

Anon, you believe in the sanctity of marriage and that it is evil to have an animal in the bedroom, yet you are ok with noncon stories or the woman being in a relationship with a Jekyll/Hyde character and being raped that way? Think you need to reconsider priorities there.

Personally I enjoy the story! Though do agree, would like to know more about the gargoyle

An interesting story to be sure. I think this particular piece would benefit from a more drawn-out approach, as it seems very cramped. There is a lot to explore with Kitty being attracted to Albert initially, so her animosity in later conversation seems a tad out of place.

George comes across as highly unlikeable and exceptionally preachy. The heavy religious content is off putting to me, but I think it could work within the frame of this story if given more time to develop.