All Comments on 'Winning Answer'

In the opener, it seemed that the girls lived at home and I asked why they didn't use his place. Now it seems as they both have places of their own. Just a tad confusing, but I enjoyed the story, nonetheless.

In the opener, it seemed that the girls lived at home and I asked why they didn't use his place. Now it seems as they both have places of their own. Just a tad confusing, but I enjoyed the story, nonetheless.

Great story!

FYI - even if 2000 was the first year of the millennium, it wasn't a leap year anyway. I think the rule is that if the year is divisible by 4, its a leap year, but not if it is divisible by 100.

Yeah, I'm a geek for knowing that, but it was burned into my head during all that Y2K crap.

The previous comment is wrong - although years at the turn of centuries (eg 1800, 1900) are not leap years, 2000 was a leap year.

Leap years are divisible by 4. Leap CENTURIES are divisible by 400. 1900 wasn't, but 2000 was a leap year.

The millenium and century started in 2001, so 2004 was the first leap year.

Hi. Obviously, some time has passed since they've started their "relationship" and both girls now have their own places. There is another chapter of this story in the works, so I will clear up some of the confusion in the Chapter and you all get a "No Prize" [ if there any Marvel Comics fans out there LOL ]

Regarding the "Leap Year" - it's open to debate. 2000 was a leap year and 2004 was the first leap year of the new century, NOT of the millenium. This actually WAS a question on Jeopardy a while back that I got and everyone else missed.

I am glad most of you are liking the story and not letting the minor stuff ruin it for you. I promise, there are some twists and turns you WON'T see coming.

enjoy your submissions; looking forward to next installment, sounds like all parties enjoying selves,everything is consentual.