All Comments on 'Solution to the World Terrorist Problem'

I think that instead of a wife they should have a Jewish Femdome. That way they can be sure that there were abouts will be known and will be to busy tending the house and children.

Wow! Vee

You crazy assed girl! Where does your mind go! Talk about turning swords into plowshares! DragonNine's comment: Jewish Femdom? Yes. D9 is so right. Please write that story. I want to read that! I loved the dialogue in the throneroom. How did you sneak into the King's Palace?

Sorry to be anonymous, I am Dina Marie

It is very plausible that celibacy and every other strict sexual moral will cause serious harm to the individuals it is applied to. And it is quite plausible that the royal family of Saudi Arabia that is nursed by the US for some reasons is supporting terrorism; it is even known that investigations right after September the 11th that led into this direction were cancelled for these reasons. But for its most part this essay is misleading. It takes for granted that on the one hand Muslim terrorism is the greatest source of terrorism in this world. It links terrorism to Islamic faith. And it assumes that an explanation for the terrorists? strange behaviour is yet to be found. It is perfectly right ?they? don?t ?hate us for our freedom and democracy?, though it?s correct that the US does obstruct the development of true democracy in so-called democracies like Egypt; democratic elections would result in the election of religious parties in most of these countries. Thus their peoples are left to be governed by men that have no authorization to govern them. The US supports Israel?s rightists in their quest to completely deprive the Palestinian people of its land. George does not even stick to the highly weird ?roadmap?: even more land shall be occupied. He very meekly retreated from his claims after massive international and especially European protests (not to say that Europe engages in progressive and peaceful activities, on the contrary). And in Iraq the US kills far more innocent civilians than the Arabs will ever be able to. If you are reluctant to believe me the most impressive text on this issue I have read is Paul Rockwell interviewed by Chris Hedges: ?Atrocities in Iraq ? 'I Killed Innocent People For Our Government'?. It should be easily found with the help of google. And there are numerous other sources. US soldiers and mercenaries (that will be listed under civilian casualties or not become known to the US public at all) aren?t only not held accountable for their killings of innocent Iraqi citizens, they even systematically kill survivors of military assaults on alleged terrorist targets that are completely unable to defend themselves. Abu Ghraib as an example of systematic torture was surely not a great idea to foster Iraqi belief in the great crusade for freedom and democracy of the US (this is not at all an exception, remember Guantanamo bay? If not try George Monbiot: XXX). So we obstruct democratization of the Arab nations and deliberately slaughter and torture their kinsmen in Palestine and Iraq. And some US statesmen think about Iran as well. So the alleged terrorists ? everyone fighting against US interests is a terrorist and everyone fighting against them is a freedom fighter ? do have some reasons to hate the US. It is not in their lunatic leaders, it is in everyone in the Third world. The Muslims only have some money and, admitted, a certain religious common ground that unites them and strengthens their solidarity for each other. If the US withdrew from Iraq, stopped to support Israel with weapons and Saudi Arabia and other dictatorships in the Middle East terrorism would decease considerably. Other means will cause impact, if they in any foster these goals.

I am yet to remind that US state terrorism has a greater impact than Muslim terrorism. In Haiti an opposition supported by about 5% of the population but well armed by you-know-who committed massacres on the population in the presence and even with the support of French and US troops in order to overthrow the democratically elected government of President Aristide. The election that brought him to power with a great majority and was subsequently called ?seriously flawed? by the US mainstream press met international standards to a higher degree than the US election that brought Bush to power. Remember some thousand black voters removed from voter?s list just before the election and the stop of the recounting? And the new rulers of Haiti continue to kill thousands of former Aristide supporters in their cause to purge the country from the thought of self-determination. If you are interested in the relations between death squads in South America and John Negroponte you won?t have problems to get the information from the net. And, finally, the US has some time ago supported Ecuador with a large credit to buy Spain tanks (as it supports similar regimes with similar credits all over the world). These tanks, if the new Spanish government should be willing to deliver them, will be deployed at the Venezuelan border. Some skirmishes in this area have already occurred and it is likely that if the referendum against Chavez fails and Ecuador is strong enough such a skirmish might become a pretext to invade the most advanced democracy in South America (if Chavez were an autocrat like most US media tells, how come that you virtually hear no voices supporting him from his country?s media which is in fact completely controlled by a rich minority?). If the people of these countries only had the means that Saudi Arabia is able to provide their reaction to US terrorism would have a more threatening impact than nowadays. So if you think about means of fighting terrorism the US is the best place in the world to do so. Protesting against your troops being sent abroad will reduce Muslim as well as US terrorism. And the most important short term necessity: don?t elect him again!

lol ... that essay stirred a few .. bet you get more .. and bet you got some nasty emails,,,

have to correct you on one point though ,, not all terrorists are of the Islam-belief .. just think ETA, IRA, path ot the light (or whatever you call it in english - columbia), the red brigades (yes they are still alive -not very active at the moment though) - and a lot more! .... oh and the bin laden family are no friends of the King od Saudi Arabia....

it's just that the islamists gets more headlines for the time beeing ..

I think that George (and happy birthday to him) could have handled things more diplomatic .. but one thing we never hear is that he had his fleet and army and airforce surrounding Iraq for a long time - that is very stretching on both personnel and economics .. he had to at the time either act (wich he chose to do) or retract and regroup, wich would've taken probably 6 month or more - and I don't think that sweedish guy could've found anything even if he had 6 years to search. Georges problem is that he -allegedly- said that Iraq had means of mass destruction - and used that as reason for the attack - he should have done as our gov did: say that Saddam had dragged UN by the nose for 12 yrs and wasn't going to comply to anything - and that "we" had to go in and look see if he had any weapons of mass destruction. But I have to say it was a little na?ve to believe that when "we" had concurred Saddam all would be great and all Iraqees would be happy over night ..

It is very plausible that celibacy and every other strict sexual moral will

cause serious harm to the individuals it is applied to. And it is quite

plausible that the royal family of Saudi Arabia that is nursed by the US for

some reasons is supporting terrorism; it is even known that investigations

right after September the 11th that led into this direction were cancelled

for these reasons. But for its most part this essay is misleading. It takes

for granted that on the one hand Muslim terrorism is the greatest source of

terrorism in this world. It links terrorism to Islamic faith. And it assumes

that an explanation for the terrorists? strange behaviour is yet to be

found. It is perfectly right ?they? don?t ?hate us for our freedom and

democracy?, though it?s correct that the US does obstruct the development of

true democracy in so-called democracies like Egypt; democratic elections

would result in the election of religious parties in most of these

countries. Thus their peoples are left to be governed by men that have no

authorization to govern them. The US supports Israel?s rightists in their

quest to completely deprive the Palestinian people of its land. George does

not even stick to the highly weird ?roadmap?: even more land shall be

occupied. He very meekly retreated from his claims after massive

international and especially European protests (not to say that Europe

engages in progressive and peaceful activities, on the contrary). And in

Iraq the US kills far more innocent civilians than the Arabs will ever be

able to. If you are reluctant to believe me the most impressive text on this

issue I have read is Paul Rockwell interviewed by Chris Hedges: ?Atrocities

in Iraq ? 'I Killed Innocent People For Our Government'?. It should be

easily found with the help of google. And there are numerous other sources.

US soldiers and mercenaries (that will be listed under civilian casualties

or not become known to the US public at all) aren?t only not held

accountable for their killings of innocent Iraqi citizens, they even

systematically kill survivors of military assaults on alleged terrorist

targets that are completely unable to defend themselves. Abu Ghraib as an

example of systematic torture was surely not a great idea to foster Iraqi

belief in the great crusade for freedom and democracy of the US (this is not

at all an exception, remember Guantanamo bay? If not try George Monbiot:

XXX). So we obstruct democratization of the Arab nations and deliberately

slaughter and torture their kinsmen in Palestine and Iraq. And some US

statesmen think about Iran as well. So the alleged terrorists ? everyone

fighting against US interests is a terrorist and everyone fighting against

them is a freedom fighter ? do have some reasons to hate the US. It is not

in their lunatic leaders, it is in everyone in the Third world. The Muslims

only have some money and, admitted, a certain religious common ground that

unites them and strengthens their solidarity for each other. If the US

withdrew from Iraq, stopped to support Israel with weapons and Saudi Arabia

and other dictatorships in the Middle East terrorism would decease

considerably. Other means will cause impact, if they in any foster these

goals.

I am yet to remind that US state terrorism has a greater impact than Muslim

terrorism. In Haiti an opposition supported by about 5% of the population

but well armed by you-know-who committed massacres on the population in the

presence and even with the support of French and US troops in order to

overthrow the democratically elected government of President Aristide. The

election that brought him to power with a great majority and was

subsequently called ?seriously flawed? by the US mainstream press met

international standards to a higher degree than the US election that brought

Bush to power. Remember some thousand black voters removed from voter?s list

just before the election and the stop of the recounting? And the new rulers

of Haiti continue to kill thousands of former Aristide supporters in their

cause to purge the country from the thought of self-determination. If you

are interested in the relations between death squads in South America and

John Negroponte you won?t have problems to get the information from the net.

And, finally, the US has some time ago supported Ecuador with a large credit

to buy Spain tanks (as it supports similar regimes with similar credits all

over the world). These tanks, if the new Spanish government should be

willing to deliver them, will be deployed at the Venezuelan border. Some

skirmishes in this area have already occurred and it is likely that if the

referendum against Chavez fails and Ecuador is strong enough such a skirmish

might become a pretext to invade the most advanced democracy in South

America (if Chavez were an autocrat like most US media tells, how come that

you virtually hear no voices supporting him from his country?s media which

is in fact completely controlled by a rich minority?). If the people of

these countries only had the means that Saudi Arabia is able to provide

their reaction to US terrorism would have a more threatening impact than

nowadays. So if you think about means of fighting terrorism the US is the

best place in the world to do so. Protesting against your troops being sent

abroad will reduce Muslim as well as US terrorism. And one of the most important

short term necessities: don?t elect him again!

Dear Anonymous "Fan"

I understand that you disagree with me on my views on how to sexually corrupt all those virginal and frustrated Moslem terrorists. And I have no problem with your disagreement, because everyone has a right to their own opinion.

But the numbers don't jive.

Dear Anonymous, you spent 1850 words refuting my essay that only contained 1740 words! Don't you have enough guts to just go ahead and write your own essay? Wouldn't that be better? Then everyone on Literotica could persue your article for themselves and give you their feedback directly.

Don't you think THAT is a great idea?? I think this is fair if the feedback contains more words than the original piece.

What do you think??

This post is a piece of shit, no offense.

I think that each side in the current conflict has greviences against the other. I despise the recent actions of Hamas, but I am now also appalled at the slaughter of Palestinian children and babies occurring in Gaza.

<p>

The median age of the Palestinian population in Gaza is roughly 18 years. That means 1 million, of the 2 million Palestinians living in Gaza, are 18 years of age or younger. About 40% of the Palestinians in Gaza are under 14 years of age. In other words, of the 1 million Palestinians in Gaza who are 18 years of age or younger, 800,000 are 15 years of age or younger.

<p>

These young Palestinians are dying, or suffering hideous, crippling wounds, in a war in which they are innocent victims. One can blame Hamas for for "human shields", but there is also the obscenity of Israeli fighter jets flying in with massive fire power that cannot possibly distinguish terrorist from child, or baby. There are mass graves on the grounds, occupied by Israelis. around at least one hospital.

<p>

Many of the young who do survive will remember the death and hatred rained upon them by the Israelis. As many cooler more thoughtful individuals have pointed out, there comes a point where one must consider whether such an operation is creating more future terrorists than it is currently killing. For me the far darker realization is that as this war proceeds, both Hamas and Israel are already condemning a future generation to shortened lives of violence and, as yet unborn, children and babies to early graves.

.

I doubt that any amount of sex will be able to erase the anger and hatred on both sides that has already kept the violence alive for so long and now threatens future generations as well.