by allenknott3
Muddled, disjointed and confusing. Just write the story and stop trying to win a Pulitzer dude!
All criticisms are welcome minus those based totally on emotions or posted under the "Anonymous." If you cannot attach your name to something then how I am supposed to take your criticism as valid?
I didn't post my name because I don't have nor want an account on this website and if you can't accept some valid criticism than you're just a joke and a poser.
alright but then how I can respond to your "valid" criticism? I cannot message someone posting under anonymous.
Second, if you think I am a joke or a poser then you are the joke and poser. Therefore your criticisms are not vaild.
Third, you say, "trying to win a Pulitizer," is not a valid criticism. It is an emotion-based criticism.
Finally, without messaging you, I cannot know what part you find to be, "Muddled, disjointed, and confusing."
Then how I am supposed to replies to your criticism? I cannot message posting under 'anonymous?'
I think you are the poser and a joke because of criticisms emotion-based for example, "stop trying to win a Pulitzer."
Without more details like in a message, I cannot know what parts are "Muddled, disjointed, and confusing."
Why does a name matter? This story didn’t need to be more than 3k max with all the padding that was done. They’re right, it’s a mess, but you can get better.
It is your opinion that the story does not need to be more than 3K words mads. A name matter because people used "Anonymous" to post without any type of consequences.
OMG the story is great, and this anon commenter is a troll, don't listen to them and write more like this!