by R410a
I have read all your romance stories. I am looking forward to reading more chapters of this story. 5* Thanks for your time and efforts.
but a few details clang. Mainly,
* a "mitigation" firm is one that deals with reducing hazards -- asbestos, various other sorts of pollution, or some sorts of workplace hazards.
* a mediation firm does dispute management -- acting as a neutral between two or more sides, urging them to find a resolution working for all (or nearly all) of those involved.
...and well told.
Mostly I was not distracted by language problems, although I was puzzled by mitigation, until I realized mediation was meant (as Drizdart has elaborated).
Also western ware should be western wear.
Brianna changed into Dorothy, then back to Brianna.
All minor distractions.
I gave 5 stars, assuming the sequels will bring resolution (I do NOT like unfinished/unresolved stories).
Paul in Oklahoma
You have me totally captivated with this one, most stories are easy to figure out but you keep adding twists. I love it.
Pick three of the above; one has nothing to do with helping two or more parties to reach an agreement. As for the story, always interested in learning of the fate of the offending party; karma?
Beware about reading too many Lowing Wifes stories
1) installing cameras and recording at home - you could easily breach privacy laws
2) threatening to release videos - attempted blackmail is a criminal offense that could see you end up with a prison sentence and for good measure you could be sued for civil damages as well which would amount to more than fines
3) moving assets off-shore - it was once on shore and hence traceable (if you are not careful moving assets off-shore, you could also end up on tax evasion charges)
No fault means the judges do not have to hear you sling mud at each other in court. Not no fault means the judges may have to hear you sling mud at each other in court, if you can afford the lawyers to do so. However, if you check the law for awarding divorce settlements to a spouse, you may well find the judge is suppose to do what is just considering all circumstances and facts of the case, but without considering fault (unless one of the spouses had used marital assets to support a third party). Adultery could well have little impact on settlements
You write very well, please don’t wonder into the what is now perceived to be part of the normal Loving Wives category landscape. It kills a good story by loading it with errors. In Loving Wives it is irrelevant, as those stories exist in the realm of fantasy
As usual it was a great story, but you ended it to soon. What happened next? does she go to work with him ? Do they get closer? Do the merry, what??
😅😅😅 HE WAS A CUCK FOR OVER 5 YEARS!! HE KNEW ABOUT IT FOR OVER 4 YEARS AND DID ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL UNTIL NOW!! AND CUCK LETS HER OFF SO EASILY!! WHAT A WEAK PATHETIC MAN!!
Hope it works out with Kat permanently!!
So many errors with names, dates, etc!!
Author has written some decent stories, but I stopped reading around the time MC said " I have already moved all my retirement assets off shore, so you can't touch those" and threatened to publish the private illegally-obtained videos. Moving accounts off-shore does not help unless he leaves the country, and he can be sued under any number of legal actions for the publications. Authors should not write stupid crap that they know nothing about.
LOL "World's best Stud" ?? agree on hairy muffs. I'd go back to Montana
The word is "mediation". Mitigation is used to reduce a sentence in a criminal matter.
Eenie had no balls to burn the bitch!!
Just another weak wimpy cuck like the writer
CUCK GETS RID OF A SKANK HELEN THEN HOOKS UP WITH THE BITCH BABYMAKER BRIANNA AND HER 4 KIDS!! AN ASSHOLE MC
Looks like Hank's gonna have a Kat in his house. Maybe she may eventually have kittens...
Why would he insult Ellie-a lawyer-by saying that in arguing her case that she was 'non-sensical'?
And as numerous others have pointed out....mitigation.
Also: I'm pretty canoodling with Ellie, one of the parties to the mediation, so soon after he had supervised the negotiation would be regarded as a serious breach of professional ethics.