"He's Gotten Laid": Proper Grammar

Story Info
Proper use of apostrophes, among other things.
1k words
4.41
4.9k
4
Share this Story

Font Size

Default Font Size

Font Spacing

Default Font Spacing

Font Face

Default Font Face

Reading Theme

Default Theme (White)
You need to Log In or Sign Up to have your customization saved in your Literotica profile.
PUBLIC BETA

Note: You can change font size, font face, and turn on dark mode by clicking the "A" icon tab in the Story Info Box.

You can temporarily switch back to a Classic Literotica® experience during our ongoing public Beta testing. Please consider leaving feedback on issues you experience or suggest improvements.

Click here

This short guide points out the most common errors of English grammar and language that I find on Literotica, including misused apostrophes, the verbs "lay" and "lie", the word "hang", and the use of simply the wrong word.

THE APOSTROPHE

One of the most common, and, for those who know better, most annoying grammatical errors in writing is the misuse of the apostrophe. Because its primary use is to denote possession, many people treat it like it can be used that way for anything. If I were one of those people, the previous sentence would begin "Because it's primary use is to denote possession..." That would be WRONG!

In most cases, an apostrophe followed by an "s" does indeed denote possession: "Uncle Tom's Cabin" (a book), "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" (a movie), "Tom's Diner" (a song), etc. But for personal pronouns (words that are not nouns but refer to things that are nouns), this is not the case. If it were, you would see the following:

me > me's

you > you's

we > we's

they > they's

While "(s)he's" and "it's" are words, they do not indicate possession. More about them later.

Instead of adding " 's " to the end of a personal pronoun, you use a completely different pronoun, called a POSSESSIVE PRONOUN. Possessive pronouns are so called because they are clingy bastards and hate being separated from their "s" by an apostrophe (just kidding, but that's one way to remember how they work). Some are so clingy, in fact, that they simply decided to kill their "s" and bury it under the floorboard in a secluded cabin in the woods, so nobody else will be able to have it. T Thus, instead of the abominations shown above, we use the following:

I > my, mine

you > your, yours

he > his

she > her, hers

it > its <-------------------- this is often misspelled "it's", which is WRONG.

we > our, ours

they > their, theirs <--- while not as common as "it's", "they're" is also WRONG.

Now, when you have an apostrophe with a pronoun, it is no longer a pronoun, or at least not in its entirety. It is technically a full sentence, and depending on the letters after the apostrophe, the tense can differ:

I have [had it] > I've

I will [be there] > I'll

I would [think so] > I'd

Except in the present tense, the rest of the pronouns use the same letters when contracted with "be" or "have" or "will" ("would" is technically a form of "will"). For the present tense, the letters differ:

I am > I'm

(s)he is > (s)he's

it is > it's

you are > you're

we are > we're (be sure not to confuse "we're wolves" with "werewolves"!)

they are > they're

This also applies to the interrogative pronouns "who", "what", "when", "where", "why" and "how", though in their case " 'd " can mean "did" in addition to "would". Another thing: "who's" does not indicate possession. Instead, this is expressed with "whose".

So, to sum up: WHEN YOU SEE AN APOSTROPHE followed by one or two letters, if the word is a noun, the apostrophe probably indicates possession (though it may indicate a contraction, but this is usually only done when referring to a person or place by name). If the word is a pronoun, the apostrophe indicates a contraction of the verb "to be", "to have" or "will/would", EXCEPT in the case of "let's", which is a contraction of "let us" (as with the werewolves, so with lettuce), and when the letter following the apostrophe is a "t", which indicates the contraction of a verb with "not".

THE VERBS "LAY" AND "LIE"

First, let's get the obvious out of the way: birds (and bugs, fish, monotremes and xenomorphs) LAY eggs; a liar LIES. Okay, now the problematic part, which you will just have to memorize:

PRESENT TENSE:

When a person actively positions their body to be parallel with the ground, they LIE down; while they are doing this, and until they get up, they are LYING down.

When a person puts something down, they LAY it down. Until they have let go of the object, they are LAYING it down.

PAST TENSE AND PERFECT/PASSIVE PARTICIPLE (look it up, I'm too lazy to explain):

A person sleeping in their bed LAY down before they fell asleep. First, though, they LAID their glasses (or whatever) on the table by their bed. Or wherever.

If a person was buried a hundred years ago, they have LAIN in their grave for a century, assuming nobody robbed it (the grave) or stole the body to use for an anatomy demonstration (and even in the latter case, they are probably still lying down on a table). The glasses (or whatever) from above were LAID on the table.

This even works with sex: when somebody is being fucked, they are getting LAID!

While I'm at it, I'll quickly explain drinking and hanging:

I drink a glass of water.

I drank a glass of water.

I have drunk a glass of water.

...and now I have to take a piss after all that water.

The picture hangs on the wall.

The picture (is) hung on the wall.

BUT

The outlaw is hangED from the gallows.

As an afterthought, there's something else that bothers me a lot when it happens:

USING THE WRONG WORD

- HOMOGRAPHS are words that are spelled the same but have different meanings; they may or may not be pronounced the same way.

- HOMONYMS are words that are pronounced and spelled the same, but have different meanings.

- HOMOPHONES are words that are pronounced the same, but have different meanings; they may or may not be spelled the same way.

- HETEROGRAPHS are words that sound the same but are spelled differently and have different meanings.

- HETERONYMS are words that are spelled the same but have different meanings and pronunciations. They are a kind of homograph. Yes, even though neither "homo-" nor "-graph" are in the word.

- HETEROPHONES are the same as heteronyms. I just included the term to fuck with you.

To avoid having to memorize these terms, simply use the correct word. For example, if you need "mare", don't use "mayor". Your submission WILL be rejected if your text reads "The stallion fucked the mayor" (unless the mayor is a horse)!

Now go and write about people getting laid, and don't do it left.

Please rate this story
The author would appreciate your feedback.
  • COMMENTS
Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous
19 Comments
rogueKlyntarrogueKlyntar11 months agoAuthor

omfg people actually do that!? Never seen that before! ugh!

AnonymousAnonymous11 months ago

You missed the most common misuse of apostrophes - when they are used to make plurals. Just today, I read about cock's and pussy's in a story instead of cocks and pussies. Plurals never ever use apostrophes.

rogueKlyntarrogueKlyntarover 1 year agoAuthor

Another thing I hate: "sentences" with a participle, usually present, but no verb. "This being an example." I think it is because some people see the participle as a verb, so if there's a subject and a participle, it must be a sentence. This is not true. Participles are forms that are derived from, but are not themselves, verbs.

AnonymousAnonymousover 1 year ago

Me again: what makes "unphased" so particularly ugly is that it appears to the casual eye to have a root in "phase", which is ridiculous. "Unfazed", in addition to being correct, discourages unfortunate etymological speculations! (Thanks for the word, by the way; I couldn't have spelled "etymological" without your help.)

Or should it be "spelt"? I'm inclined to say that it doesn't matter what base motives make a person use the -ed form; he or she is moving the language in a positive direction, toward regularization. Sadly, I doubt if it is even possible to regularize "to be".

-- C

rogueKlyntarrogueKlyntarover 1 year agoAuthor

To the same Anonymous: if you go to GadenKerensky's "Xenophilia - Phoebe - Pt. 02", at the end of the third paragraph, or the second paragraph of the actual story, you will find the word "unphased".

GK is apparently British, so he misspells lots of words, except they are authorised by some weirdo who decided "licorice" should be spelled "liquorice". Which I will admit makes etymological sense, but still looks weird.

rogueKlyntarrogueKlyntarover 1 year agoAuthor

To the most recent Anonymous (or at least the author of the most recently approved comment):

I suppose it is debatable, whether apostrophes are mainly for possession or contraction. I didn't really think about it that ay, I just chose possession since that is how most people seem to think of it, ergo the misuse of "it's".

I realize language evolves and that it is becoming more acceptable to simply add "-ed" to a verb, but in my opinion it doesn't count as "evolving" if it's just because people are too lazy/uneducated to do it the right way.

AnonymousAnonymousover 1 year ago

Apostrophes: You say "its primary use is to denote possession". I think its primary use is to denote contraction. Most possessives do involve contraction, true, but there are also possessive articles that do not. We used, centuries ago, to say "the dog, his bone" to refer to a bone in the dog's mouth, but we now say "the dog's bone", the apostrophe indicating the contraction. When it comes to its vs. it's, well, its is the possessive article. Even in olden times, they didn't need any artificial construction to talk about the door's color using a pronoun: its color, both then and now. The possessive its is not a contraction and should not be burdened with an apostrophe.

Drank and hanged: "to drink" is an irregular verb. "to hang" was irregular, and to an extent it still is, but in this country it becoming a regular verb. So we say we drank, not drinked, which would correct if it were regular; and we can get away with hung as well as hanged, because the verb is in transition, (slowly) becoming regular. I'm 69 years old, and forms that were taught me as regular look wrong when regularized, but I hold my tongue because I favor the regularization of the language.

BUT, dammit, I will NOT accept "unphased" to mean unconcerned or unbothered; the word is UNFAZED!

rogueKlyntarrogueKlyntarover 1 year agoAuthor

Shit I found a typo.

AnonymousAnonymousover 1 year ago

To the "Anonymous" who posted after TheGreyWolf81: Dsylexia has nothing to do with grammar. If you grew up speaking the language and you can write it at all, it's kinda expected that you should be able to write it at least passably. Stuff like improper tense mixing is inexcusable. Besides, you can't tell me that improper grammar doesn't interfere with understanding. The very purpose of grammar is ease of understanding, and it's not just something arbitrary like table manners. Grammar and syntax develop over the course of centuries as a language evolves. I say this as somebody who has studied linguistics, majored in French and Latin, used to be fluent in Spanish, and has studied German, Ancient Greek, Old English and Old Norse, the last three in decreasing order of familiarity.

AnonymousAnonymousover 1 year ago

another english major all proud of their skills ..u good at english great we are proud of you so write your perfict prose all perfictly spelled and proper use of all them little things , . ; : " ? well some of us are dyslexic and never do better than a c in english hard to write when you cant spell kind of like someone in a wheel chair running a foot race doesnt meen that people are stupid just a little handy capped do you laugh at people in wheel chairs ? should i laugh at you trying to weld or run a crane or build a reactor or turbine generator? we all are good at some things and not others ...if you read a story and are entertained by it for a time than mission accomnplished dont pick on people just to make yourself feel supperior

Show More
Share this Story

Similar Stories

Amazonian Womb Worms Ch. 01-05 What happens when a penis-like parasite finds a woman host?in Erotic Horror
Lesbian Tentacles Ch. 01 Natalie explains her first experience with her tentacles.in Sci-Fi & Fantasy
Catch and Release Ch. 01 Sisters on a cruise meet a woman who will change their lives.in Lesbian Sex
Bad Brat Girl Domme Sarah needs Daddy's help to reach her submissive side.in BDSM
The Anal Bride A wife gives her arse to her husband on their wedding night.in Anal
More Stories