All Comments on 'Complementarity Ch. 01'

by Willmaxx

Sort by:
  • 4 Comments
bwwm4mebwwm4meover 4 years ago

Would suggest you work on making the dialogue more realistic.

Dunn81Dunn81over 4 years ago
Id love to see..

Black femdom stories.

sike94sike94over 4 years ago
Yikes

A white supremacist story masquerading as an erotic interracial story. Shameful

AnonymousAnonymousover 3 years ago
Bullshit and nonsenses

This so-called “story” IS FULL OF BULLSHIT AND NONSENSES!IT’S NOT TRUE AT ALL and IT WILL BE NEVER TRUE that “a man worthy of this word can not envision having a happy life without having a satisfying sexual life with a diversity of partners” or that “one woman can not satisfy his natural need of diversity which he find in himself”!Also,IT IS DEFINITELY NOT TRUE that it is “love that ultimately sells this illusion to men:the belief that the beloved is enough to satisfy his sexual desire throughout his life” or that “this illusion - the belief that the beloved is enough to satisfy the sexual desire throughout life- evaporates continually after the marriage,even if the woman is exceptional.The man who finds in him the will to live,not the one who sees the meaning of his life only in the life of his wife and children,this man resorts to mistresses as the last solution.The women know that very well since they are more intelligent socially than men,but they prefer blaming men and tyrannizing their nature because it suits their social interests”!WHAT A HUGE BUNCH OF CRAP!First of ALL,IT’S ABSOLUTELY OBVIOUS that ANY MAN WORTHY OF THIS WORD WOULD ALWAYS ENVISION TO HAVE A HAPPY LIFE TOGETHER WITH HIS WIFE,HAVING A MOST SATISFYING SEXUAL LIFE WITH HER,HAVING NO NEED AT ALL of any “diversity of partners”!And,on the contrary,ONE WOMAN CAN PERFECTLY WELL SATISFY HIM because HE tHAS NO “NATURAL NEED OF DIVERSITY” in himself!THERE IS NO SUCH THING as “natural need” because MEN(AND WOMEN) ARE MONOGAMOUS BY NATURE!Then,LOVE DOESN’T SELL ANY ILLUSION because IT’S DEFINITELY NOT AN “ILLUSION”,BUT A FACT that THE BELOVED ONE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO SATISFY A MAN’S SEXUAL DESIRE throughout HIS ENTIRE LIFE!Also,ALL MEN HAVE IN THEM “THE WILL TO LIVE”,so THEY NORMALLY DON’T HAVE TO “FIND IT” in them and those who see “the meaning of their life only in the life of their wife and children” HAVE THE WILL TO LIVE,TOO!SEEING THE MEANING OF YOUR LIFE IN THE LIVES OF THE ONES YOU LOVE AND CHERISH ISN’T AT ALL SOMETHING BAD,but SOMETHING VERY GOOD AND WHICH MUST BE PRAISED because IT’S VERY ALTRUISTICAL!But THAT DOESN’T MEAN AT ALL that a man who sees the meaning of life in the life of his wife and children has not the will to live FOR HIMSELF ,TOO or that a man would resort to mistresses as “the last solution” or AS ANY SOLTUTION!A REAL MAN WITH THE WILL TO LIVE LIVES FOR HIMSELF AND ALSO FOR HIS FAMILY and DEFINITELY HAS NO NEED OF ANY MISTRESS because HE HAS HIS WIFE ALONGSIDE HIM!Therefore,WOMEN DON’T BLAME MEN or “prefer” blaming them and THEY CERTAINLY AREN’T “TYRANIZING” MEN’S NATURE because MEN’S NATURE ISN’T AT ALL the of some sex obsessed creatures!Also,THIS DOESN’T SUIT ANY OF THEIR SOCIAL INTERESTS,since THEIR SOCIAL INTERESTS ARE TO GET ALONG WITH MEN and DEFINITELY NOT TO ATTACK THEM!Then,WOMEN CERTAINLY AREN’T “more intelligent than men!MEN ARE FAR MORE INTELLIGENT SOCIALLY THAN WOMEN and THIS IS A PROVEN FACT!And THERE IS NO “BESTIAL SIDE OF THE THING” when talking about the sexual side!THAT’S SIMPLY ANOTHER HUGE RUBBISH!PEOPLE ARE NOT ANIMALS,YOU BIG IDIOT!In bed IT’S ABOUT LOVE AND PASSION,NOT ABOUT SOMETHING BESTIAL!Besides,BLACK MEN AREN’T AT ALL “BETTER IN BED” than white men!On the contrary,WHITE MEN ARE BETTER IN BED THAN BLACK MEN!THERE IS NO QUESTION OF DENYING THIS SUPERIORITY and THE LARGE MAJORITY OF WOMEN KNOW THAT VERY WELL!That’s why A LOT OF NON-WHITE WOMEN TAKE WHITE LOVERS!

Finally,I HAVE TO SAY that I STRONGLY DISAGREE with someone who said in a comment that this PIECE OF SHIT is a “white supremacist story”!THIS IS NOT A WHITE SUPREMACIST STORY because IT CONTAINS ASPECTS OF BLACK SUPREMACY AS WELL!

Anonymous
Our Comments Policy is available in the Lit FAQ
Post as:
Anonymous